• Users Online: 182
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page
Home About us Editorial board Ahead of print Current issue Search Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2018  |  Volume : 35  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 246-252

Human round window: morphometry and topographical anatomy and their effect on cochlear implantation


1 Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Benha University, Benha, Egypt
2 Department of Anatomy and Embryology, Benha University, Benha, Egypt

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Sara R Gabal
MSc of Otorhinolaryngeology Benha University, Atreeb, 9 Shendy Street, from Nassar street, Benha, Qualiobia, 13518
Egypt
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/1110-208X.239200

Rights and Permissions

Background Renewal interest of round window (RW) approaches necessitates further acquaintance of its complex anatomy and its variations. Aim of work The aim of this work is to study the anatomical characteristics of human RW and the importance of variations in this anatomy to the process of cochlear implantation (CI). Materials and Methods Twenty human temporal bones were obtained from cadavers and preserved in formalin. Microdissection was done in two phases, phase 1 through facial recess approach and phase 2 external auditory canal approach after the tympanic membrane and ear ossicles were removed, the RW and OW areas were exposed, shape, height and width of the RW were noted. Its distances from OW was measured. Results Oval (60%), round (25%) and triangular (15%) shapes of RW were observed. The average height and width of the RW were 1.91 ± 0.78 mm and 1.37 ± 0.43 mm, respectively. There was a statistically significant correlation (r = 0.95, P < 0.001) between the height and width of RW. The distances between the RW and the OW was in the range of 1–3.5 mm. There were no statistically significant differences as regard to gender, or side. Electrode insertion could be challenging in cases where the height and width of the RW are <1 mm. Conclusion This information could be useful for selecting cochlear implant electrodes in order to avoid potential risks to vital neurovascular structures during implant surgery.


[FULL TEXT] [PDF]*
Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed97    
    Printed1    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded18    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal